Skip to main content

 


Project Name: Time-Specific Photo Project (formerly 1:30 PM Project)

Purpose / Principle:

  • Take a photo at the same specific time of day to document life consistently.

  • Share that photo with friends, maintaining personal connection and a sense of continuity.

  • Originally at 1:30 PM, but now the time has shifted because your daily activity patterns have changed.

Current Update:

  • Most photos now happen at 4:00 PM or later, so the project principle stays the same: capture life at a fixed reference time.

  • Time should be updated to match your current photo habits while keeping the integrity of a “time-based snapshot.”

Tasks / Steps:

  1. Pick the Current Time:

    • Decide a fixed time (e.g., 4:00 PM) to take photos daily or whenever possible.

  2. Take the Photo:

    • Capture the moment at that exact time.

    • Include subjects, scenes, or contexts that reflect your life on that day.

  3. Send to Friends:

    • Share the photo with one or more friends.

    • Optional: include a note or caption about the moment.

  4. Archive / Track:

    • Keep a record of photos with timestamps.

    • Maintain a visual log of your life over weeks, months, or years.

Goal / Outcome:

  • Continue the original project’s spirit: a daily (or regular) life snapshot at a consistent time.

  • Maintain connection with friends.

  • Build a long-term visual diary reflecting your life rhythm.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math

Math tutoring services popular as public schools struggle with poor math scores https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/math-tutoring-services-popular-as-public-schools-struggle-with-poor-math-scores-1.3717879  Spirit of Math --private tutoring companies  Oxford Learning program -Standardized test scores down and tutoring goes up!  EDIT TO HERE Abbas says  "One of our concerns, which we've heard from many parents, is that once (students) get to high school, all of a sudden they are flabbergasted by the amount of math or kind of math they need to do." -Toronto Star, Peter Goffin, The Canadian Press Published Tuesday, December 12, 2017 The rise in enrolment at such programs coincides with a decline in math scores on standardized tests amongst elementary students in the province. Tutoring companies like Kumon and Oxford Learning say they help students develop independent learning ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Security‑review site reports it as “suspicious website”

  What it claims SoulmateMeets presents itself as an online platform for connecting people through meaningful, heartfelt communication and potential romantic relationships. soulmatemeets.com On its signup page it states you can browse profiles, like/react, chat, and engage at your own pace (casual chat → deeper). soulmatemeets.com Free to register, but features (especially messaging/chat) appear to be paid/credit‑based. Trustpilot +1 ⚠️ Red flags & concerns The website is very new: domain registration as of May 6 2025. Gridinsoft LLC +1 Ownership info is unclear (WHOIS shows proxy) and trust‑scoring sites flag it as low reliability. ScamAdviser +1 User reviews are heavily mixed. On Trustpilot the average is around 2.9/5 and many complaints involve high cost, bots/fake profiles, or lack of genuine connections. Trustpilot Security‑review site reports it as “suspicious website” with a trust score of 1/100 in one analysis.  Gridinsoft LLC Many user ...
Post a Comment
Read more

IQ Chart: Human Intelligence, Animal Comparison & AI Capabilities

  IQ Chart: Human Intelligence, Animal Comparison & AI Capabilities Ed Scholz · Follow 2 min read Range: 0 to 250 #1–0–30 Human Cognitive Abilities : Severe cognitive impairment; limited to basic survival tasks. Animal Comparison : Basic reflexive behaviors (e.g., instincts). AI Capabilities : Extremely limited, unable to solve problems. Notable AI Systems : None. Notable Examples : None. #2–30–50 Human Cognitive Abilities : Limited cognition; significant difficulty with simple tasks. Animal Comparison : Rudimentary problem-solving but no abstraction (e.g., rats). AI Capabilities : Basic pattern recognition, no reasoning. Notable AI Systems : None. Notable Examples : None. #3–50–70 Human Cognitive Abilities : Below average; struggles with simple tasks. Animal Comparison : Basic task learning but lacks reasoning (e.g., rats). AI Capabilities : Early speech recognition and basic automation. Notable AI Systems : ELIZA. Notable Examples : None. #4–70–85 Human Cognitive Abilities : ...
Post a Comment
Read more