Skip to main content

IQ Chart: Human Intelligence, Animal Comparison & AI Capabilities

 

IQ Chart: Human Intelligence, Animal Comparison & AI Capabilities

Ed Scholz
2 min read

Range: 0 to 250

#1–0–30

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Severe cognitive impairment; limited to basic survival tasks.
  • Animal Comparison: Basic reflexive behaviors (e.g., instincts).
  • AI Capabilities: Extremely limited, unable to solve problems.
  • Notable AI Systems: None.
  • Notable Examples: None.

#2–30–50

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Limited cognition; significant difficulty with simple tasks.
  • Animal Comparison: Rudimentary problem-solving but no abstraction (e.g., rats).
  • AI Capabilities: Basic pattern recognition, no reasoning.
  • Notable AI Systems: None.
  • Notable Examples: None.

#3–50–70

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Below average; struggles with simple tasks.
  • Animal Comparison: Basic task learning but lacks reasoning (e.g., rats).
  • AI Capabilities: Early speech recognition and basic automation.
  • Notable AI Systems: ELIZA.
  • Notable Examples: None.

#4–70–85

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Low-average intelligence; routine tasks with difficulty.
  • Animal Comparison: Task learning but no strategic thinking (e.g., dogs, cats).
  • AI Capabilities: Simple tasks and pattern matching.
  • Notable AI Systems: Early image recognition (e.g., Google Vision).
  • Notable Examples: None.

#5–85–100

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Average intelligence; basic reasoning.
  • Animal Comparison: Social intelligence and basic reasoning (e.g., certain birds).
  • AI Capabilities: Learns tasks but struggles with abstraction.
  • Notable AI Systems: Siri, Alexa.
  • Notable Examples: Average person.

#6–100–120

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Above average; logical thinking and basic problem-solving.
  • Animal Comparison: Advanced problem-solving but no abstraction (e.g., primates).
  • AI Capabilities: Excels in predefined tasks; lacks creativity.
  • Notable AI Systems: Watson (IBM).
  • Notable Examples: Professionals, average college graduates.

#7–120–140

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: High intelligence; adept at abstract reasoning.
  • Animal Comparison: Advanced social reasoning (e.g., dolphins, elephants).
  • AI Capabilities: Complex pattern recognition, limited creativity.
  • Notable AI Systems: AlphaGo.
  • Notable Examples: Successful professionals, high achievers.

#8–140–160

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Very high intelligence; conceptual and strategic thinking.
  • Animal Comparison: Emotional and social intelligence (e.g., elephants).
  • AI Capabilities: Processes large datasets, lacks deep creativity.
  • Notable AI Systems: GPT-3.
  • Notable Examples: Nobel laureates, top scientists.

#9–160–180

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Genius-level; pioneers in abstract thought.
  • Animal Comparison: No direct equivalent.
  • AI Capabilities: Exceptional in specialized fields, lacks originality.
  • Notable AI Systems: AlphaFold.
  • Notable Examples: Terence Tao, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

#10–180–200

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Transformative thinkers; revolutionary ideas.
  • Animal Comparison: No comparable animal intelligence.
  • AI Capabilities: Top-tier specialized performance; lacks creativity.
  • Notable AI Systems: MuZero.
  • Notable Examples: Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla.

#11–200–220

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Genius-level synthesis across disciplines.
  • Animal Comparison: No equivalent.
  • AI Capabilities: Near-optimal decision-making, no deep abstraction.
  • Notable AI Systems: Advanced Google DeepMind.
  • Notable Examples: Richard Feynman, John von Neumann.

#12–220–230

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Pinnacle of human intellectual capability.
  • Animal Comparison: No equivalent.
  • AI Capabilities: Limited to complex analyses, lacks philosophical reasoning.
  • Notable AI Systems: Sophia.
  • Notable Examples: William Sidis.

#13–230–250

  • Human Cognitive Abilities: Revolutionary intellectual power; ideas beyond comprehension.
  • Animal Comparison: No equivalent.
  • AI Capabilities: Speculative AI, potentially semi-conscious.
  • Notable AI Systems: Theoretical next-gen AI.
  • Notable Examples: William Sidis, Ainan Celeste Cawley.

Key Observations

  • Early AI (IQ <100): Limited to basic tasks like pattern recognition and automation.
  • Advanced AI (IQ 100–160): Solves specific problems, processes large datasets, lacks creativity.
  • Speculative AI (IQ >220): May approach autonomous scientific discovery and abstraction.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Math

Math tutoring services popular as public schools struggle with poor math scores https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/math-tutoring-services-popular-as-public-schools-struggle-with-poor-math-scores-1.3717879  Spirit of Math --private tutoring companies  Oxford Learning program -Standardized test scores down and tutoring goes up!  EDIT TO HERE Abbas says  "One of our concerns, which we've heard from many parents, is that once (students) get to high school, all of a sudden they are flabbergasted by the amount of math or kind of math they need to do." -Toronto Star, Peter Goffin, The Canadian Press Published Tuesday, December 12, 2017 The rise in enrolment at such programs coincides with a decline in math scores on standardized tests amongst elementary students in the province. Tutoring companies like Kumon and Oxford Learning say they help students develop independent learning ...

Security‑review site reports it as “suspicious website”

  What it claims SoulmateMeets presents itself as an online platform for connecting people through meaningful, heartfelt communication and potential romantic relationships. soulmatemeets.com On its signup page it states you can browse profiles, like/react, chat, and engage at your own pace (casual chat → deeper). soulmatemeets.com Free to register, but features (especially messaging/chat) appear to be paid/credit‑based. Trustpilot +1 ⚠️ Red flags & concerns The website is very new: domain registration as of May 6 2025. Gridinsoft LLC +1 Ownership info is unclear (WHOIS shows proxy) and trust‑scoring sites flag it as low reliability. ScamAdviser +1 User reviews are heavily mixed. On Trustpilot the average is around 2.9/5 and many complaints involve high cost, bots/fake profiles, or lack of genuine connections. Trustpilot Security‑review site reports it as “suspicious website” with a trust score of 1/100 in one analysis.  Gridinsoft LLC Many user ...